DINOSAURS and THE BIBLE

by Ken Ham

This article at the below link would be seen by some as inordinately shattering pet paradigms. It may be seen by others as giving us insight into how things really happened as opposed to the pre-conditioned madness we have been subjected to by those with all the credentials but with built-in blind spots who may in fact be casting away the truth for the fairy tales of their own misbegotten prejudices.

Judge for yourself when dinosaurs made their imprint, for they surely did exist!

Inspector LeBeau

http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/4176/

OTHER REFERENCES TO CURRENT DINOSAURS

THE CREATION ANSWERS BOOK, edited by Don Batten, and go to chaper 19; for instance, on pages 244 & 245, we have four interesting accounts: in A.D. 900, AN IRISH ACCOUNT OF A "STEGOSAURUS;" IN A.D. 1405, AN ENGLISH ACCOUNT OF A DRAGON KILLING THE SHEPHERD AND HIS SHEEP; IN A.D. 1845, AN AUSTRALIAN ACCOUNT OF A "BUNYIP" (DUCK-BILLED DINOSAUR.)

In the OLD TESTAMEN (JOB 40:15-19) A BIG DINOSAUR IS HIGHLY SUGGESTIVE IN THE DESCRIPTION OF THE BEHEMOTH. [This should make anyone think that dinosaurs may have been created much later than today's scientists have postulated, which is the theme of the above-named book! Can anyone say "BRACHIOSAURUS" is the actual animal Job may have seen, matching up more clearly with the description as opposed to the elephant or hippo?!?  HOWEVER to say this such an animal must have been alive within the time frame of JOB, which is EXACTLY what the Creationists believe! You know the tail was described as like the cedars of Lebanon, and those darn cedars grew mightily BIG, unlike the elephant & hippo!]

To secure book, call 1800 6161 264. {{This is a GOLD MINE book with over 60 answers to the puzzling questions surrounding the creation of the Earth as recorded in the 'BOOK OF GENESIS.'}}

CONGO BEAST SIGHTED BY BIOLOGIST:

http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/833

LOCH NESS MONSTER CAUGHT ON VIDEO 2007

http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/5212

NOW PONDER THIS!

If you can digest the fact that this was possibly done - I.E., that dinosaurs are real history that walked the earth when men walked the earth (and not 65 million years ago,) then it may not have escaped your attention that God could just as easily have "recreated" them after the GREAT FLOOD, so there would have been no need to bring at least two of every KIND within the confines of THE GREAT ARK.

BUT HE DIDN'T! Why not?  Why are you reading this now? In the New Testament, Jesus (as God the Son,) brought bread and fish out of the ether - fully intact so that the 4000 & 5000 could eat, not once, but twice! He could have done the same for the "recreation" of the dinosaur and every other land-breathing animal that was in the ark. BUT HE DID NOT!

Perhaps God is drawing our attention to the details of what He did do, and when He did accomplsih this, so that you would be believing and not unbelieving that THE GREAT FLOOD was a reality, a true history of God's judgment, and a pre-cursor to what will happen at THE SECOND COMING...as in the days of Noah!

He is perhaps highlighting the importantce of this event so we do not make the mistake (like the evolutionists already have) that there was no great flood - and therefore the words of Jesus must be null & void since He said there was.

and THERE WAS A GREAT FLOOD, AND JESUS'S WORDS ARE ACCURATE, JUST LIKE THE DETAILS OF THE ABOVE-MENTIONED BOOK ARE ACCURATE too.